Search for: "Harris v. Bevis"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
June 26, 2009 - Supreme Court Hands Down Bevy of Opinions COURT FINDS VAGUENESS IN CURRENT LAW AND SPLITS ON EFFECTIVE DATE OF APPELLATE DECISIONEdwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:28 am
Joining Griffith on the bench were Judges Harry T. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 10:43 am
” United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 8:00 am
In Harris County, Tex. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
